![]() ![]() It has switched from, 'Isn't it terrible that AI is a failure?' to 'Isn't it terrible that AI is a success?' "Īs is usually the case, the reality is not so extreme. As Peter Norvig aptly put it, "The narrative has changed. Furthermore, with the very negative portrayals of futuristic artificial intelligence in Hollywood, it is perhaps not surprising that doomsday images are appearing with some frequency in the media. If you hadn't already noticed, the "AI Winter" is over and the spring has begun.Īs with many trends, some people have started to become a little bit too optimistic about the rate of progress, going as far as predicting that a solution to human level artificial intelligence might be just around the corner. We see this in our interactions with a wide range of researchers, and it can also be seen from the way in which media articles about artificial intelligence have changed in tone. However, in recent years the climate for ambitious artificial intelligence research has much improved, no doubt due to a string of stunning successes in the field: not only have a number of long standing challenges finally fallen, but there is a growing sense among the community that the best is yet to come. While some researchers have been cheering us on since the start of DeepMind, others have been very skeptical. The potential benefits of artificial intelligence will be vast, but like any powerful technology these benefits will depend on this technology being applied with care. Along with this we have been standing up for the idea that the safety and ethics of artificial intelligence is an important topic we should all be thinking about very seriously. But until we replicate the embodied emotional being-a feat I don't believe we can achieve-our machines will continue to serve as occasional analogies for thought, and to evolve according to our needs.įor years we've been making the case that artificial intelligence, and in particular the field of machine learning, is making rapid progress and is set to make a whole lot more progress. They are good at tasks, and we have become very good at using them for our purposes, and for expanding our capacity for communication. Machines do not have social lives any more than they are embodied within a complex, evolved set of biological tissues. But the complexity of this enterprise is as much a characteristic of the human condition as is our embodiment. Thinking is itself in part a socially given capacity, and to think is to participate of a collective enterprise. Much of our memory is assigned to Google, and there is no doubt that our minds are increasingly extended beyond our single bodies, that we exist within an increasingly large network of disembodied minds and data. Machines are developing task-driven cognitive capacities, but their perfect processing is very different indeed from the imperfect, inconstant, subtle thinking of persons endowed with a sense of self, proprioception, a sense of centeredness, the "qualia" that distinguishes us from "zombies."Ĭomputers excel at processing processes most of us fumble with, and we are increasingly accessing the world of facts via machines. We are our bodies, we have emotions that are embodied and that deeply inform our thinking processes. Thinking seems so disembodied an activity that we forget that we are emphatically not brains in vats, that no amount of microtechnology will recreate the complexities of biology thanks to which our brains function, replete with neurotransmitters, enzymes, and hormones. Science fiction imagines perfect robots, indistinguishable from ourselves, embodied, speaking, seemingly feeling, that can fool and even perhaps attack us.īut in thinking conceptually about our own minds, we tend to remain Cartesian dualists. No wonder then that we so easily imagine the creations becoming creatures in their own right, endowed with minds as agile as ours, or more agile perhaps. Our creations are starting to escape our own minds. We have by now created technologies that no single person is able to master. To each era its machine-from hydraulic pumps to computers. And in order to look at ourselves in the mirror, we have always used technological analogies, compared our minds to the technologies we had created. We have developed a capacity for metarepresentation-a capacity to be aware of having, and to analyze our own minds-which is a function of higher order consciousness. The evolution of the human mind is instantiated in the evolution of technology. We have always used our cognitive capacities to create the objects we needed to survive, from weapons to garments and shelters. The history of humanity and the history of technology are conjoined. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |